[admin] |
All people, however fanatical they may be in their zeal to disparage and to fight capitalism, implicitly pay homage to it by passionately clamoring for the products it turns out.-- Ludwig Von Mises August 25, 2003A tally of US taxpayers' tab for IraqTim insists that I link to this article about the cost of the US involvement in Iraq. Surprise, surprise, "reconstruction" is costing a fortune. Probably the biggest cost of the war is the cost in increased oil prices (no “blood for oil,” eh?) Since there has been some misunderstanding about my stance on Iraq, let me clear things up.
Comments
Whew, for a moment there I thought you supported the State. Posted by: Tim Swanson at August 25, 2003 11:38 PM"I adamantly oppose the reconstruction of any oil refinery, factory, or even one golf shack with money taken from me without my consent." What if I oppose money taken from me to fund a military intervention to rid the world of those "motherfuckers"? You are utilizing collectivism to justify such actions as removing a threat to _America_" or destroying "terrorism." By collectively blaming the _states_ of Iran and North Korea, you suffer from the very problem you attempt to avoid. These societies -- whom you clearly _collectively_ blame for terrorism -- are the same societies whom Ayn Rand claimed cannot be labelled as things that act or have values. In fact, she maintained that it was only _individuals_ that are responsible, have values and use reason. How then can "Iran" or "North Korea" deserve the plight of US nukes or military intervention? Would that not be collectivism in action? If you so whole-heartedly believe that stolen tax-money shouldn't be used for reconstruction, how do you differentiate between "removing a dictator" and "nation-building"? I suspect that you believe that Saddam was a "threat." To whom? "America"? --Collectivism! "Democracy"? Collectivism!!! You _cannot_, I repeat, _cannot_ avoid collectivism while supporting tax-funded State actions. Therefore, individualists much shun all State actions. Posted by: Mike at August 26, 2003 12:31 AMI think you have to consider this as an investment just as we invested in Japan. Not only did it provide better security so that you don't have the "welcome the new boss, same as the old boss" effect in another terrorist-supporting regime that you have to wipe out later on, but a valuable trading partner in the future. Posted by: at August 26, 2003 04:48 PM"I think you have to consider this as an investment just as we invested in Japan. Not only did it provide better security so that you don't have the "welcome the new boss, same as the old boss" effect in another terrorist-supporting regime that you have to wipe out later on, but a valuable trading partner in the future." Pure Collectivism. Feel free to do what you want, but please don't do something "for my own good" that I have not asked for. And Japan turned out to be a great puppet, why can't everyone think like "us"?!? Additionally, you really haven't changed anything -- just like the individuals that clamor for "regime change at home" all you effectively did was replace one State with another, the State still exists and it still aggresses. Posted by: Tim Swanson at August 26, 2003 11:19 PM
Post a comment
|
Interact:
Forum
Top Shelf:
Friends:
Calendar:
Archives:
March 2004
February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003 March 2003 February 2003 January 2003 December 2002 November 2002 October 2002 September 2002 August 2002 July 2002 June 2002 May 2002
Search
Recent Entries: Martha Stewart convicted Who stands to benefit from civil unrest in Iraq? Applied Death Worship 101 "Topless rights" Top Twelve Reasons Not to Support Gay Marriage The "Children's Online Privacy Protection Act" Go CIA! Anti-China Protest in Taiwan
Categories:
Random Blog:
|
About Me | Blog | Essays | Photo Album | Resume | Webcam | Favorites | Projects | Contact | |