An account of a vacation to the other “socialist paradise.”
Man loses papers, stuck in French airport since 1988.
How do courts swear in atheists?
Child actor Gary Coleman competes with Arnold for govenor of the People State of CA
And to stir up some debate, my post Objectivists Need A Church, Too
Cool idea, huh?*
*(Disclaimer: Clicking on this link may or may not affect the valuation of this stock. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Fund unit values and investment returns will fluctuate. The indicated rate(s) of return is (are) the historical annual compounded total return(s) assuming the investment strategy recommended by the asset allocation service is used and after deduction of the fees and charges in respect of the service. The return(s) is (are) based on the historical annual compounded total returns of the participating funds including changes in (share) (unit) value and reinvestment of all (dividends or distributions) and does (do) not take into account sales, redemption, distribution or optional charges or income taxes payable by any security holder that would have reduced returns. Blog performance is not guaranteed, the values change frequently and past performance may not be repeated. Watch out for the SEC or it will put you in the slammer on some arbitrary whim and throw away the key.)
I can’t believe I haven’t head about this, but apparently, in 1996, Alan Sokal, a physicist at NYU, wrote an article titled “Transgressing the Boundaries: Toward a Transformative Hermeneutics of Quantum Gravity“, in which he parodied cultural studies, postmodernism, and so on, writing a paper full of gibberish using dozens of Marxist, Socialist and other “Post-Modern” writers. The hillarious thing is that he actually got the paper published in a peer-review journal, “Social Text” — which as you might imagine, is full of such postmodern crap.
What’s really hilarious is that the paper is full of complete gibberish, yet makes fun of all the “post-modern” crap that has been popularized in academia, and shows how “a liberatory postmodern science” leads to blatant nonsense when subjectivism is applied to scientific knowledge.