Get this: according to the leftists, even one civilian death was unacceptable when our troops went after Saddam. However, when it comes to the �anti-occupation resistance,� innocent deaths are perfectly fine, says a prominent leftist pundit:
Do you think the anti-war movement should be supporting Iraq's anti-occupation resistance?(I am just going to ignore the fact that he�s rooting for the collapse of any chance for democracy and American soldier�s and Iraqi civilians deaths -- to leftists, destroying Bush's popularity is paramount.)
"Yes, I do. We cannot afford to be choosy. While we abhor and condemn the continuing loss of innocent life in Iraq, we have no choice now but to support the resistance, for if the resistance fails, the �Bush gang� will attack another country. If they succeed, a grievous blow will be suffered by the Bush gang."
Written by David at January 28, 2004 12:07 AM | TrackBack
Awesome...
Objectivists simply know how to deconstruct an argument by identifying its premises and expounding on the logical implications of those premises.